Comparison Overview

Clark County School District

VS

NSW Department of Education

Clark County School District

Clark County School District, 2832 E Flamingo Road, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89121
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Clark County School District is the 5th largest school district in the nation with over 300,000 students in 357 schools and over 40,000 employees. Our focus is on people – the educators, staff, students and parents who make our community one of the most diverse and dynamic places in the country. Our vision is for all students to graduate from high school having the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values necessary to achieve academically, prosper economically, and contribute in a global society. In recent years, CCSD has been the fastest growing district in the country, building more than 110 new schools since 2000, including six new Career & Technical Academies and some of the top magnet schools in the nation. Here are some highlights of our achievements: Ranked among the top 10 school districts in the nation for its use of blended learning programs by Edgenuity, an online provider of education solutions. Council of Chief State School Offices (CCSSO) announced that L. Juliana Urtubey is among 4 exemplary educators from across the country who are finalists for 2021 National Teacher of the Year. Named 2015 Advance Placement District of the year by the College Board for expanding access to Advanced Placement courses while improving AP Exam performance. U.S. Department of Education selected 2 CCSD schools as 2015 National Blue Ribbon Schools for their overall excellence among only 335 public and private schools recognized nationwide. Newsweek ranked 5 CCSD high schools among the best in the nation. Magnet Schools of America recognized 17 CCSD magnet schools for their outstanding programs and overall excellence. 13 of the 17 CCSD schools received the highest designation possible from MSA -"Magnet School of Excellence!"​ Las Vegas Academy of the Arts has 12 Grammy awards under its belt- more than any other school in the nation!

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 22,694
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

NSW Department of Education

undefined, Sydney, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At the NSW Department of Education, our goal is to be Australia's best education system and one of the finest in the world. We prepare young people for rewarding lives as engaged citizens in a complex and dynamic society. With nearly 100,000 employees working in schools and offices throughout the state, we can offer you a varied and rewarding career in your chosen field. Working with us gives you access to: - flexible working conditions - attractive salaries - generous holidays - opportunities for advancement - a culture of professional support By supporting every one of our employees to meet their personal goals at work, we can best meet NSW's goals for quality public education. Follow us on Twitter: @NSWEducation

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 33,878
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clark-county-school-district.jpeg
Clark County School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-department-of-education.jpeg
NSW Department of Education
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Clark County School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NSW Department of Education
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clark County School District in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSW Department of Education in 2025.

Incident History — Clark County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clark County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NSW Department of Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSW Department of Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clark-county-school-district.jpeg
Clark County School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-department-of-education.jpeg
NSW Department of Education
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NSW Department of Education company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Clark County School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NSW Department of Education company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Clark County School District company.

In the current year, NSW Department of Education company and Clark County School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both NSW Department of Education company and Clark County School District company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

NSW Department of Education company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Clark County School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NSW Department of Education company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Clark County School District company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Clark County School District company nor NSW Department of Education company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NSW Department of Education company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clark County School District company.

NSW Department of Education company employs more people globally than Clark County School District company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Clark County School District nor NSW Department of Education holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H