Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont HotelClaremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel
VS
AccorAccor
Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel

Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel

41 Tunnel Road, Berkeley, CA, 94705, US

Last Update: 26/02/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

Situated on 22 acres in the East Bay with breathtaking views of San Francisco, Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel seamlessly blends its rich 19th century history with the modern day to offer the very best of the Bay Area. The resort’s 276 guestrooms are designed sp...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:149
Subsidiaries:109
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Accor

Accor

82 rue Henri Farman, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Paris Region, FR, 92130

Last Update: 14/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.group.accor.com
806/1000Good

We are Accor We are more than 290,000 hospitality experts placing people at the heart of what we do, creating emotion for our guests, and nurturing passion for service and achievement beyond limits. Building on the strength of our teams and of our fully integrated ecos...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:101,371
Subsidiaries:91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel

Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Accor

Accor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accor in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Accor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel

Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Accor

Accor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel company and Accor company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel and Accor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel and Accor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel or Accor ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel or Accor ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel and Accor, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Claremont Club & Spa, A Fairmont Hotel and Accor, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44453
SUMMARY

h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Prior to commit 6b5370d, h2o is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack when calling alloca under certain conditions. When serving static files, h2o builds the file path on stack, by calling alloca. The maximum size of the memory allocated using alloca can be as huge as ~600KB, which exceeds the default pthread stack size used by musl libc (128KB). If the amount of memory allocated by alloca exceeds the stack size, the h2o server crashes with a segmentation fault, while it tries to touch the guard page. This issue has been fixed by commit 6b5370d.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-44452
SUMMARY

h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Prior to commit 8dc37cb, when h2o receives a ClientHello message over TLS or QUIC and it contains a zero-length SNI extension, the h2o server runs over the zero-length hostname while trying to copy the hostname, assuming that it is NULL-terminated. This is a potential denial-of-service attack vector in sense that it might trigger segmentation violation. This issue has been fixed by commit 8dc37cb.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-44436
SUMMARY

Quicly is an IETF QUIC protocol implementation intended primarily for use within the H2O HTTP server. Prior to commit 8b178e6, Quicly is vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack through connection state corruption. In QUIC Invariants, the maximum length of a Connection ID is 255 bytes, while QUIC version 1 further restricts the maximum to 20 bytes. Quicly implements QUIC version 1 and therefore its CID buffers are limited to 20 bytes. However, to be able to respond to unknown versions of QUIC, its packet decoder accepts Connection IDs of up to 255 bytes. As its CID buffers are merely 20 bytes long, Quicly must reject QUIC version 1 packets with Connection IDs longer than that. The command line tool bundled with Quicly has had that check, however the library itself lacked such enforcement. As a consequence, when used by applications that lack their own enforcement, the connection state becoming inconsistent to buffer overrun. Fortunately, the overflow stops within the allocated chunk of memory, but nevertheless, the bug leads to assertion failures. This issue has been fixed by commit 8b178e6.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-44435
SUMMARY

Quicly is an IETF QUIC protocol implementation intended primarily for use within the H2O HTTP server. Prior to commit 937d0e9, an assertion failure is raised when the total number of valid handshake messages received over a CRYPTO stream of a single packet number space exceeds 32KB, causing a Denial of Service. This issue has been fixed by commit 937d0e9.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-44434
SUMMARY

Quicly is an IETF QUIC protocol implementation intended primarily for use within the H2O HTTP server. Prior to commit dccf5d4, Quicly was vulnerable to stateless reset injection through lack of packet entry validation. The QUIC protocol is designed to withstand packet injection attacks, once the handshake is complete. Only packets that carry some secret patterns are considered as stateless resets. Quicly allows the peer to share up to 4 such patterns per connection. However, until now, it failed to determine which of the 4 slots that it uses to retain the secret patterns contains a valid entry. As the slots are zero-initialized, the failure meant that, unless the peer advertised 4 of such patterns, an all-zero pattern was treated as a stateless reset.In effect, this allowed an on-path attacker to reset QUIC connections governed by Quicly. This issue has been fixed by commit dccf5d4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-16
UPDATED
Date2026-07-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9