Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Clara by AGCClara by AGC
VS
UltraTech CementUltraTech Cement
Clara by AGC

Clara by AGC

Industrielaan 1, Kortrijk (Heule), 8501, BE

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.clarafenster.be
744/1000Moderate

As a brand of AGC Glass Europe, Clara shares the same values of sustainability, high quality products and services, innovation, integrity and diversity. Clara by AGC is the world’s first window made entirely of glass, combining the superior technical properties of AGC...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 17/09/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

UltraTech Cement Ltd. is the largest manufacturer of grey cement, Ready Mix Concrete (RMC) and white cement in India. It is also one of the leading cement producers globally. UltraTech as a brand embodies 'strength', 'reliability' and 'innovation'. Together, these attri...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:30,152
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Clara by AGC

Clara by AGC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clara by AGC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UltraTech Cement in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Clara by AGC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clara by AGC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UltraTech Cement (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UltraTech Cement cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Clara by AGC

Clara by AGC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UltraTech Cement

UltraTech Cement

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Clara by AGC company and UltraTech Cement company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Clara by AGC and UltraTech Cement, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Clara by AGC and UltraTech Cement, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Clara by AGC or UltraTech Cement ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Clara by AGC or UltraTech Cement ?
Between Clara by AGC and UltraTech Cement, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Clara by AGC and UltraTech Cement, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA