Comparison Overview
CKR Consulting Engineers

CKR Consulting Engineers
11 9th Street, Houghton Estate, Johannesburg, 2198, ZA
Last Update: 11/12/2025
Founded in 1982 with its roots in Johannesburg, South Africa, CKR Consulting Engineers have grown to become one of the leading multi-disciplinary engineering firms in Africa, the Middle East and Asia. CKR Consulting Engineers can address all your build environment engi...

UGL
Level 8, 40 Miller Street, North Sydney, NSW, AU, 2060
Last Update: 14/09/2026
UGL is CIMIC Group's specialist end-to-end engineering, services and operations provider. We have a rich history dating back to 1899 and since then we have grown to be a market leader in many of the sectors in which we operate. Working with some of the most important c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CKR Consulting Engineers







UGL






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CKR Consulting Engineers in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UGL in 2026.
Incident History - CKR Consulting Engineers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CKR Consulting Engineers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UGL (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UGL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CKR Consulting Engineers

UGL
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.