Comparison Overview
CJ OliveNetworks

CJ OliveNetworks
용산구 한강대로 366 (동자동) , 서울특별시, 04323, KR
Last Update: 27/12/2025
CJ올리브네트웍스는 1995년 창립이래 생활∙문화 기반의 종합 IT서비스를 성공적으로 제공함으로써 고객 만족과 가치를 실현하고 있으며, 고객의 신뢰와 지지를 바탕으로 견실하고 안정적인 성장을 지속해오고 있습니다. 지난 25여년 간 IT시스템 구축 및 서비스로 축적된 경험과 노하우를 바탕으로 CJ그룹의 디지털 전환(Digital Transformation)을 위한 계열사 디지털 혁신을 주도하고 있으며 스마트스토어, AI팩토리, 빅데이터, 블록체인 등 4차 산업혁명 시대에 경쟁력있...

TIVIT
Avenida das Nações Unidas 8501, São Paulo, 05425-070, BR
Last Update: 12/09/2026
TIVIT is a Brazil-based multinational company that offers enterprise-level digital solutions, and operates in ten countries in Latin America. We help our clients develop their businesses by offering industry-leading digital solutions divided into four main categories: D...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CJ OliveNetworks







TIVIT






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CJ OliveNetworks in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TIVIT in 2026.
Incident History - CJ OliveNetworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CJ OliveNetworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TIVIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TIVIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CJ OliveNetworks

TIVIT
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.