Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CJ프레시웨이CJ프레시웨이
VS
Frito-LayFrito-Lay
CJ프레시웨이

CJ프레시웨이

마포구 월드컵북로54길 25, CJ프레시웨이, 서울시, 03924, KR

Last Update: 03/06/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

CJ프레시웨이는 고객의 사업 성공에 기여하는 ONLYONE 푸드 솔루션 기업으로 식자재 유통과 푸드 서비스의 혁신을 만들어 가고 있습니다. 국내 대기업 최초로 기업 간(B2B) 식자재 유통 산업에 도전을 시작으로, 최대 규모의 전국 유통망과 빅데이터 기반 선진 물류시스템을 구축하여 신선한 먹거리를 고객에게 제공하고 있습니다. 나아가 국내외 2만 4천여종의 차별화된 상품 소싱 역량과 인프라, 임직원의 전문성을 바탕으로 밀(Meal) 솔루션과 비즈니스 솔루션을 통해 사업 단계와 ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:338
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Frito-Lay

Frito-Lay

7701 Legacy Dr, Plano, 75024, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fritolay.com
785/1000Fair

We believe every consumer should have access to their favorite snack, everywhere. We own the manufacturing process from seed to shelf and actively invest in technology to automate key steps of the process. This helps us be more agile in what we need to make, who we need...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:16,136
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CJ프레시웨이

CJ프레시웨이

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Frito-Lay

Frito-Lay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CJ프레시웨이 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frito-Lay in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CJ프레시웨이 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CJ프레시웨이 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Frito-Lay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frito-Lay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CJ프레시웨이

CJ프레시웨이

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Frito-Lay

Frito-Lay

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 company and Frito-Lay company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 and Frito-Lay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 and Frito-Lay, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CJ프레시웨이 or Frito-Lay ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CJ프레시웨이 or Frito-Lay ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 and Frito-Lay, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CJ프레시웨이 and Frito-Lay, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA