Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CJ America, Inc.CJ America, Inc.
VS
DanoneDanone
CJ America, Inc.

CJ America, Inc.

300 S Grand Ave, Los Angeles, 90071, US

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cjamerica.com
747/1000Moderate

From our beginnings as Korea’s first sugar manufacturer to our expansion into the U.S. in 1978, we’ve evolved into a global lifestyle company in food, entertainment, logistics, and biotechnology. With a presence in 30 states across the country, we are proud to bring peo...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:134
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Danone

Danone

17 boulevard Haussmann, Paris, 75000, FR

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danone.com
805/1000Good

Danone is a leading global food and beverage company operating in three health-focused, fast-growing, and on-trend Categories: Essential Dairy & Plant-Based products, Waters, and Specialized Nutrition. With a long-standing mission of bringing health through food to as...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:70,667
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CJ America, Inc.

CJ America, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Danone

Danone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CJ America, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danone in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CJ America, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CJ America, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Danone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CJ America, Inc.

CJ America, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Danone

Danone

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CJ America, Inc. company and Danone company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CJ America, Inc. and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CJ America, Inc. and Danone, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CJ America, Inc. or Danone ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CJ America, Inc. or Danone ?
Between CJ America, Inc. and Danone, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CJ America, Inc. and Danone, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8