Comparison Overview
City of Rome, New York

City of Rome, New York
198 N Washington St, Rome, 13440, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
City of Rome, New York

City of Philadelphia
City Hall, Philadelphia, 19102, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
With a workforce of 30,000 people, and opportunities in 1,000 different job categories, the City of Philadelphia is one of the largest employers in Southeastern Pennsylvania. As an employer, we operate through the guiding principles of service, integrity, respect, accou...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

City of Rome, New York







City of Philadelphia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
City of Rome, New York has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for City of Philadelphia in 2026.
Incident History - City of Rome, New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)
City of Rome, New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - City of Philadelphia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
City of Philadelphia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

City of Rome, New York

City of Philadelphia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.