Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

City of RiversideCity of Riverside
VS
NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric AdministrationNOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
City of Riverside

City of Riverside

US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.riversideca.gov
742/1000Moderate

The rapidly growing City of Riverside currently ranks as the 12th largest city in California, 6th in Southern California, and is the largest city in one of the fastest growing regions in the United States. It is home to four internationally recognized universities and ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:1,594
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 20230, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.noaa.gov
777/1000Fair

Welcome! We're the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration or NOAA. From daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings and climate monitoring to fisheries management, coastal restoration and supporting marine commerce, our products and services support economic ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,346
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
City of Riverside

City of Riverside

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Riverside in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - City of Riverside (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Riverside cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
City of Riverside

City of Riverside

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CIT225030622
NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NOA1313191123

FAQ

Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between City of Riverside company and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between City of Riverside and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between City of Riverside and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - City of Riverside or NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - City of Riverside or NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration ?
Between City of Riverside and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between City of Riverside and NOAA: National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8