Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

City of PeabodyCity of Peabody
VS
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)
City of Peabody

City of Peabody

01960, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.peabody-ma.gov
766/1000Fair

Manage all facets of commercial and residential development with a staff of 25. Disciplines within the department include Inspectional Services, Planning, Community Development Block Grant management, Conservation and Zoning.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:302
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

Av. Héroe de Nacozari Sur 2301, Aguascalientes, 20276, MX

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inegi.org.mx
776/1000Fair

The National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) is an autonomous institution of the Federal Public Sector. INEGI is the coordinator of the National System of Statistical and Geographical Information of Mexico. The main objective of INEGI is to pr...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,384
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
City of Peabody

City of Peabody

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Peabody in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - City of Peabody (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Peabody cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
City of Peabody

City of Peabody

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DBMCITCIT1770832987
National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between City of Peabody company and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between City of Peabody and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between City of Peabody and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - City of Peabody or National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - City of Peabody or National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI) ?
Between City of Peabody and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between City of Peabody and National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico (INEGI), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1