Comparison Overview

City of Fresno

VS

Rijkswaterstaat

City of Fresno

US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Official LinkedIn for the City of Fresno - the 5th largest city in California #OneFresno

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 2,100
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 2500 EX, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat beschermd is tegen overstromingen. Waar voldoende groen is, en voldoende en schoon water. En waar je vlot en veilig van A naar B kunt. Samenwerken aan een veilig, leefbaar en bereikbaar Nederland. Dat is Rijkswaterstaat. Bij Rijkswaterstaat werk je mee aan de toekomst van Nederland met de ruimte om jezelf te blijven ontwikkelen. Gun jezelf een baan met toekomst. Gun jezelf Rijkswaterstaat.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 12,123
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-fresno.jpeg
City of Fresno
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijkswaterstaat.jpeg
Rijkswaterstaat
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Fresno
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rijkswaterstaat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Fresno in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2025.

Incident History — City of Fresno (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Fresno cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-fresno.jpeg
City of Fresno
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijkswaterstaat.jpeg
Rijkswaterstaat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rijkswaterstaat company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Fresno company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

City of Fresno company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rijkswaterstaat company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rijkswaterstaat company and City of Fresno company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor City of Fresno company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rijkswaterstaat company nor City of Fresno company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

City of Fresno company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Rijkswaterstaat company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither City of Fresno company nor Rijkswaterstaat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rijkswaterstaat company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Fresno company.

Rijkswaterstaat company employs more people globally than City of Fresno company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Fresno nor Rijkswaterstaat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.