Comparison Overview

City of Durant

VS

State of Oregon

City of Durant

300 W Evergreen, Durant, 74701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-01
Between 550 and 599

Durant is a city in Bryan County, Oklahoma, United States and serves as the capital of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. The population was 18,589 at the 2020 census. Durant is the principal city of the Durant Micropolitan Statistical Area, which had a population of 42,416 in 2010. Durant ranks as the second largest city within the Choctaw Nation, following McAlester, and ahead of Poteau. Durant is also part of the Dallas-Fort Worth Combined Statistical Area, anchoring the northern edge. The city was founded by Dixon Durant, a Choctaw who lived in the area,after the MK&T railroad came through the Indian Territory in the early 1870s. It became the county seat of Bryan County in 1907 after Oklahoma statehood. Durant is home to Southeastern Oklahoma State University and the headquarters of the Choctaw Nation. The city is officially known as the Magnolia Capital of Oklahoma. The city and its micropolitan are a major part of the Texoma region.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

State of Oregon

Salem, 97301, US
Last Update: 2026-01-02
Between 750 and 799

Official LinkedIn page for the state of Oregon. Oregon is a state in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. It is located on the Pacific coast, with Washington to the north, California to the south, Nevada on the southeast and Idaho to the east. The Columbia and Snake rivers delineate much of Oregon's northern and eastern boundaries, respectively. The area was inhabited by many indigenous tribes before the arrival of traders, explorers, and settlers who formed an autonomous government in Oregon Country in 1843. The Oregon Territory was created in 1848, and Oregon became the 33rd state on February 14, 1859.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 10,454
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-durant-oklahoma.jpeg
City of Durant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-oregon.jpeg
State of Oregon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
City of Durant
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Oregon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

City of Durant has 53.27% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Oregon in 2026.

Incident History — City of Durant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Durant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/city-of-durant-oklahoma.jpeg
City of Durant
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-oregon.jpeg
State of Oregon
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data exfiltration and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Oregon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to City of Durant company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State of Oregon company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to City of Durant company.

In the current year, City of Durant company has reported more cyber incidents than State of Oregon company.

Both State of Oregon company and City of Durant company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

State of Oregon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while City of Durant company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State of Oregon company nor City of Durant company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither City of Durant company nor State of Oregon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

State of Oregon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to City of Durant company.

State of Oregon company employs more people globally than City of Durant company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither City of Durant nor State of Oregon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools that allow for the interaction, manipulation, and application of International Color Consortium (ICC) color management profiles. Versions prior to 2.3.1.2 have a NULL pointer member call vulnerability. This vulnerability affects users of the iccDEV library who process ICC color profiles. Version 2.3.1.2 contains a patch. No known workarounds are available.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Themify Themify Sidepane WordPress Theme, Themify Themify Newsy, Themify Themify Folo, Themify Themify Edmin, Themify Bloggie, Themify Photobox, Themify Wigi, Themify Rezo, Themify Slide allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Themify Sidepane WordPress Theme: from n/a through 1.9.8; Themify Newsy: from n/a through 1.9.9; Themify Folo: from n/a through 1.9.6; Themify Edmin: from n/a through 2.0.0; Bloggie: from n/a through 2.0.8; Photobox: from n/a through 2.0.1; Wigi: from n/a through 2.0.1; Rezo: from n/a through 1.9.7; Slide: from n/a through 1.7.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in AA-Team Woocommerce Sales Funnel Builder, AA-Team Amazon Affiliates Addon for WPBakery Page Builder (formerly Visual Composer) allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Woocommerce Sales Funnel Builder: from n/a through 1.1; Amazon Affiliates Addon for WPBakery Page Builder (formerly Visual Composer): from n/a through 1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in AA-Team Premium Age Verification / Restriction for WordPress, AA-Team Responsive Coming Soon Landing Page / Holding Page for WordPress allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Premium Age Verification / Restriction for WordPress: from n/a through 3.0.2; Responsive Coming Soon Landing Page / Holding Page for WordPress: from n/a through 3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed attacker controlled HTML to be rendered by the Filter component (search) across GitHub that could be used to exfiltrate sensitive information. An attacker would require permissions to create or modify the names of milestones, issues, pull requests, or similar entities that are rendered in the vulnerable filter/search components. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.20 and was fixed in versions 3.19.1, and 3.18.2, 3.17.8, 3.16.11, 3.15.15, and 3.14.20. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X