Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

City of CologneCity of Cologne
VS
Workingfor.beWorkingfor.be
City of Cologne

City of Cologne

DE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
821/1000Good

Sie möchten sich neu ansiedeln, Ihren Betrieb erweitern oder Ihr Unternehmen verlagern. Sie suchen ein neues Grundstück oder eine Immobilie. Sie möchten ein gewerblich nutzbares Grundstück vermieten, verpachten oder veräußern. Sie haben ein Anliegen an die Stadtverwaltu...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:166
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Simon Bolivarlaan 30, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.workingfor.be
782/1000Fair

Workingfor.be is the job platform of the federal administration. Here, you will find a wide variety of jobs in different fields of profession. Every day thousands of our employees help build tomorrow's society. When you choose the federal administration, you choos...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
City of Cologne

City of Cologne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Cologne in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workingfor.be in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - City of Cologne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Cologne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Workingfor.be (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workingfor.be cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
City of Cologne

City of Cologne

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CIT2328151023
Workingfor.be

Workingfor.be

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between City of Cologne company and Workingfor.be company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between City of Cologne and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between City of Cologne and Workingfor.be, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - City of Cologne or Workingfor.be ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - City of Cologne or Workingfor.be ?
Between City of Cologne and Workingfor.be, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between City of Cologne and Workingfor.be, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8