Comparison Overview
Citrix Partner Network

Citrix Partner Network
899 Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, 33309, US
Last Update: 30/11/2025
As a Citrix Partner, we help you amplify your impact on customers’ businesses. Here’s how: - Expand your market opportunities by connecting to our entire partner ecosystem - Access new capabilities that will let you meet your customers’ needs more comprehensively ...

Computacenter
Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, GB, AL10 9TW
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Tran...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Citrix Partner Network







Computacenter






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Citrix Partner Network in 2026.
Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2026.
Incident History - Citrix Partner Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Citrix Partner Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Citrix Partner Network

Computacenter
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.