Comparison Overview
Cisco Industrial IoT

Cisco Industrial IoT
170 West Tasman Dr., San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 17/01/2026
At Cisco Industrial IoT, we accelerate digital transformation by simplifying IT for industrial networks. We promote the connectivity of assets, applications, and data in real time. By offering end-to-end solutions, we empower businesses to drive change and achieve outst...

Sutherland
1160 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford (Rochester), NY, US, 14534
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Artificial Intelligence. Automation. Cloud Engineering. Advanced Analytics. For Enterprises, these are key factors of success. For us, they’re our core expertise. We work with global iconic brands. We bring them a unique value proposition through market-leading techn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cisco Industrial IoT







Sutherland






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cisco Industrial IoT in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sutherland in 2026.
Incident History - Cisco Industrial IoT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cisco Industrial IoT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sutherland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sutherland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cisco Industrial IoT

Sutherland
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.