Comparison Overview

Cisco

VS

KPIT

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, CA, US, 95134
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 600 and 649

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its customers, partners and communities to unlock innovation, enhance productivity and strengthen digital resilience. With purpose at its core, Cisco remains committed to creating a more connected and inclusive future for all.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 95,475
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
5

KPIT

SEZ Unit-2 , Plot no- 17, Phase 3, Hinjewadi Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411057
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

About KPIT KPIT is reimagining the future of mobility, forging ahead with group companies and partners to shape a world that is cleaner, smarter, and safer. With over 25 years of specialized expertise in Mobility, KPIT is accelerating the transformation towards Software and AI-Defined Vehicles through its advanced solutions, platforms, and products—propelled by mobility-infused AI frameworks, software craftsmanship, and systems integration mastery. Vision in Motion Fueled by 2000+ vehicle production programs and powering 20+ million vehicles on the road with KPIT software, our experience in unmatched. At the same time, we push boundaries, developing solutions that enable Mobility OEMs to innovate at speed and scale. For more details, visit www.kpit.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16,309
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cisco.jpeg
Cisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpit.jpeg
KPIT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cisco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPIT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Cisco has 934.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPIT in 2025.

Incident History — Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KPIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cisco.jpeg
Cisco
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploited Vulnerabilities (unspecified), Phishing/Social Engineering (likely), DDoS Attacks, Threatening Calls to Executives
Motivation: Financial Gain (ransomware proceeds, access sales)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation (Cisco ASA), Malware Implantation, Command Execution, Potential Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Unauthenticated Access to VPN Endpoints, Crafted HTTP Requests
Motivation: Opportunistic Exploitation, Potential Data Theft, Malware Distribution
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpit.jpeg
KPIT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KPIT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cisco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cisco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KPIT company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cisco company has reported more cyber incidents than KPIT company.

Cisco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while KPIT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cisco company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other KPIT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cisco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while KPIT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cisco company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while KPIT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cisco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KPIT company.

Cisco company employs more people globally than KPIT company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cisco nor KPIT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N