Comparison Overview
Cisco Service Provider

Cisco Service Provider
300 E Tasman Dr, San Jose, 95134, US
Last Update: 13/03/2026
This is the official Cisco LinkedIn page for Service Provider updates, insights, trends, news, and events.

Luxoft
Gubelstrasse 24, Zug, 6300, CH
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company (NYSE: DXC), is a digital strategy and software engineering firm providing bespoke technology solutions that drive business change for customers the world over. Acquired by U.S. company DXC Technology in 2019, Luxoft is a global operatio...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cisco Service Provider







Luxoft






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cisco Service Provider in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Luxoft in 2026.
Incident History - Cisco Service Provider (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cisco Service Provider cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Luxoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Luxoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cisco Service Provider

Luxoft
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.