Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cisco MerakiCisco Meraki
VS
MeituanMeituan
Cisco Meraki

Cisco Meraki

500 Terry A. Francois Blvd, San Francisco, California, US, 94158

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://meraki.cisco.com
768/1000Fair

At Cisco Meraki, we create intuitive technologies to optimize experiences, secure locations, and seamlessly connect people, places, and things. We love to push boundaries, experiment, and make IT easier, faster, and smarter for our customers. By doing this, we hope to c...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:2,767
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Meituan

Meituan

Wangjing International R&D Park, No.6 Wangjing East Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, CN, 100102

Last Update: 20/06/2026

View Profile
780/1000Fair

Adhering to the ‘Retail + Technology’ strategy, Meituan commits to its mission that 'We help people eat better, live better'. Since its establishment in March 2010, Meituan has advanced the digital upgrading of services and goods retail on both supply and demand sides....

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:41,158
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cisco Meraki

Cisco Meraki

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Meituan

Meituan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Cisco Meraki has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meituan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cisco Meraki (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco Meraki cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Meituan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meituan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cisco Meraki

Cisco Meraki

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PRICIS1776775110
Meituan

Meituan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MEI231827722

FAQ

Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cisco Meraki company and Meituan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cisco Meraki and Meituan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cisco Meraki and Meituan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cisco Meraki or Meituan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cisco Meraki or Meituan ?
Between Cisco Meraki and Meituan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cisco Meraki and Meituan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA