Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cinnober Financial TechnologyCinnober Financial Technology
VS
Guaranty TrustGuaranty Trust
Cinnober Financial Technology

Cinnober Financial Technology

N/A

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cinnober.com
752/1000Fair

Cinnober is now a part of Nasdaq. Cinnober is a leading provider of trading and clearing technology, serving exchanges and clearinghouses globally. Our multi-asset class solutions are used by some of the world’s most demanding financial marketplaces to deliver mission...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Guaranty Trust

Guaranty Trust

Plot 635, Akin Adesola, Victoria Island, Lagos State, Nigeria, Lagos, NG

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gtbank.com
693/1000Weak

We are Guaranty Trust. Founded in 1990, we own and operate one of Africa's best managed banking franchises, serving over 24 million customers across 10 African countries and the United Kingdom. We are Proudly African and Truly International. We believe in getting it r...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:10,213
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cinnober Financial Technology

Cinnober Financial Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Guaranty Trust

Guaranty Trust

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinnober Financial Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Guaranty Trust has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Cinnober Financial Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinnober Financial Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Guaranty Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guaranty Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cinnober Financial Technology

Cinnober Financial Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Guaranty Trust

Guaranty Trust

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GTCZEN1785882465

FAQ

Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology company and Guaranty Trust company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology and Guaranty Trust, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology and Guaranty Trust, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cinnober Financial Technology or Guaranty Trust ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cinnober Financial Technology or Guaranty Trust ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology and Guaranty Trust, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cinnober Financial Technology and Guaranty Trust, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES