Comparison Overview

Cinemark

VS

The Walt Disney Company

Cinemark

3900 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX, US, 75093
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cinemark.com

Headquartered in Plano, TX, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. provides premium out-of-home entertainment experiences as one of the largest and most influential theatrical exhibition companies in the world with 497 theatres and 5,644 screens in the U.S. and Latin America as of September 30, 2025. • Our circuit is the third largest in the U.S. with 304 theatres and 4,249 screens in 42 states. • We ranked either #1 or #2 in box office revenues in 21 of our top 25 markets. • We are one of the most geographically diverse circuits in Latin America with 193 theatres and 1,395 screens in 13 countries. • We have a presence in 15 of the top 20 metropolitan cities in South and Central America.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 12,365
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, CA, 91521, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.disneycareers.com

The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise that includes three core business segments: Disney Entertainment, ESPN, and Disney Experiences. Our mission is to entertain, inform and inspire people around the globe through the power of unparalleled storytelling, reflecting the iconic brands, creative minds and innovative technologies that make us the world’s premier entertainment company.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 177,769
Subsidiaries: 64
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cinemark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Walt Disney Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinemark in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

The Walt Disney Company has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Cinemark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinemark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Walt Disney Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Walt Disney Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Malware
Motivation: Data exfiltration, Financial gain, Public disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malicious AI tool installation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Cinemark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Walt Disney Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Walt Disney Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cinemark company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Walt Disney Company company has reported more cyber incidents than Cinemark company.

The Walt Disney Company company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Cinemark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

The Walt Disney Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Cinemark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company company nor Cinemark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cinemark company nor The Walt Disney Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Walt Disney Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cinemark company.

The Walt Disney Company company employs more people globally than Cinemark company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cinemark nor The Walt Disney Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References