Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CINCCINC
VS
ColliersColliers
CINC

CINC

300 Galleria Pkwy, 1500, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cincpro.com/
755/1000Fair

CINC (Commissions, Inc.) is the #1 all-in-one real estate lead generation & conversion CRM platform for teams and top agents. Expert Google & Facebook lead generation, IDX websites, intelligent CRM, lead nurturing automations and more. Request a demo to learn more abo...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:178
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Colliers

Colliers

1140 Bay St, Suite 4000, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5S 2B4

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ow.ly/gksi50Rpork
787/1000Fair

Colliers (NASDAQ, TSX: CIGI) is a global diversified professional services and investment management company operating through three industry-leading businesses: Commercial Real Estate, Engineering and Investment Management. With greater than a 30-year track record of c...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:29,555
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CINC

CINC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Colliers

Colliers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CINC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colliers in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CINC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CINC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Colliers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colliers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CINC

CINC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Colliers

Colliers

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
COL21825522

FAQ

Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CINC company and Colliers company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CINC and Colliers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CINC and Colliers, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CINC or Colliers ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CINC or Colliers ?
Between CINC and Colliers, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CINC and Colliers, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9