Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cincinnati Children's GivingCincinnati Children's Giving
VS
American Medical ResponseAmerican Medical Response
Cincinnati Children's Giving

Cincinnati Children's Giving

3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, 45229, US

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Together we advance pioneering research and develop innovative programs, treatments and cures. And we provide the support and reassurances that families need in their darkest hours. No matter what you are most passionate about in the area of child health, you can find i...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
American Medical Response

American Medical Response

6363 S. Fiddlers Green Circle, Greenwood Village, 80111, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amr.net
769/1000Fair

American Medical Response, America’s leading provider of medical transportation, has a single mission: making a difference by caring for people in need. AMR solutions include 911 emergency, interfacility transportation, event medical, advanced & basic life support trans...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,635
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cincinnati Children's Giving

Cincinnati Children's Giving

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Medical Response

American Medical Response

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Children's Giving in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Medical Response in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cincinnati Children's Giving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Children's Giving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Medical Response (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Medical Response cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cincinnati Children's Giving

Cincinnati Children's Giving

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
American Medical Response

American Medical Response

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME538072525

FAQ

Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving company and American Medical Response company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving and American Medical Response, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving and American Medical Response, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cincinnati Children's Giving or American Medical Response ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cincinnati Children's Giving or American Medical Response ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving and American Medical Response, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cincinnati Children's Giving and American Medical Response, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1