Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CIMIC Group GraduatesCIMIC Group Graduates
VS
Mott MacDonaldMott MacDonald
CIMIC Group Graduates

CIMIC Group Graduates

177 Pacific Highway, North Sydney, 2060, AU

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

CIMIC Group is an engineering-led construction, mining, services and infrastructure development leader working across the lifecycle of assets, infrastructure and resources projects. CIMIC Group includes our construction businesses CPB Contractors, Leighton Asia and Br...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

10 Fleet Place, London, EC4M 7, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://mottmac.com
800/1000Good

We are an engineering, management and development consultancy and one of the largest wholly employee-owned firms of our kind. We plan, design, deliver and maintain the transport, energy, water, defence and security, and buildings infrastructure that is integral to peo...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:24,383
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CIMIC Group Graduates

CIMIC Group Graduates

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIMIC Group Graduates in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mott MacDonald in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CIMIC Group Graduates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIMIC Group Graduates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mott MacDonald (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mott MacDonald cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CIMIC Group Graduates

CIMIC Group Graduates

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mott MacDonald

Mott MacDonald

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates company and Mott MacDonald company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates and Mott MacDonald, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates and Mott MacDonald, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CIMIC Group Graduates or Mott MacDonald ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CIMIC Group Graduates or Mott MacDonald ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates and Mott MacDonald, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CIMIC Group Graduates and Mott MacDonald, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9