Comparison Overview
CIMB Wealth Advisors

CIMB Wealth Advisors
50, 52 & 54 Jalan SS 21/39,, Petaling Jaya, Selangor 47400, MY
Last Update: 15/02/2026
CIMB Wealth Advisors was incorporated in 1990 and has since then grown into one of the largest retail distribution arms in the financial services industry with a dynamic sales force of about 4600 FiMM (formerly known as FMUTM) registered consultants and financial planne...

CreditEase
朝阳区建国路88号SOHO现代城16层, 北京, CN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Founded in 2006, CreditEase is a Beijing-based world-leading FinTech conglomerate in China. It specializes in inclusive finance and wealth management with a dominant position in credit technology, wealth management technology, insurance technology, etc. Main business se...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CIMB Wealth Advisors







CreditEase






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CIMB Wealth Advisors in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CreditEase in 2026.
Incident History - CIMB Wealth Advisors (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CIMB Wealth Advisors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CreditEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CreditEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CIMB Wealth Advisors

CreditEase
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.