Comparison Overview
Cigogne Management
Cigogne Management
18 Boulevard Royal, Luxembourg, L-2449, LU
Last Update: 14/03/2026
Spécialisée dans les activités d’arbitrage, Cigogne Management S.A. est la société de gestion alternative de Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale (détenue à 100%). Présente depuis 2004 à Luxembourg, Cigogne Management S.A. gère pour ses investisseurs plus de 2 Mds € d’act...
Ackermans & van Haaren
Begijnenvest 113 Antwerp, 2000, BE
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Ackermans & van Haaren is a diversified group active in 4 core sectors: Marine Engineering & Contracting (DEME, one of the largest dredging companies in the world - CFE, a construction group with headquarters in Belgium), Private Banking (Delen Private Bank, one of the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Cigogne Management
Ackermans & van Haaren
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cigogne Management in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ackermans & van Haaren in 2026.
Incident History - Cigogne Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cigogne Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ackermans & van Haaren (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ackermans & van Haaren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Cigogne Management
Ackermans & van Haaren
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an inadequate encryption strength vulnerability which could allow an attacker to steal admin credentials via weak hash or a pass-the-hash attack.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could allow for asset discovery by unauthenticated users.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an unintended proxy or intermediary vulnerability which could allow an attacker to use an active proxy, which would bypass OT segmentation.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE Versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have a plaintext storage of a password vulnerability that could expose cleartext credentials through the API.
Pronetiqs IntraVUE versions 3.2.1a14 and prior have an exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere vulnerability which could expose the underlying host/share filesystem.