Comparison Overview
Cigna Healthcare

Cigna Healthcare
900 Cottage Grove Road, Bloomfield, 06002, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
We are a health benefits provider that advocates for better health through every stage of life. We guide our customers through the health care system, empowering them with the information and insight they need to improve their health and vitality.

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
55, Boulevard Diderot, Paris, 75012, FR
Last Update: 11/09/2026
AP-HP (Greater Paris University Hospitals) is a European world-renowned university hospital. Its 39 hospitals treat 8 million people every year: in consultation, emergency, during scheduled or home hospitalizations. The AP-HP provides a public health service for everyo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cigna Healthcare







Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cigna Healthcare in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP in 2026.
Incident History - Cigna Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cigna Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cigna Healthcare

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.