Comparison Overview
Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong
Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong
348 Kwun Tong Road, Kowloon, HK
Last Update: 19/02/2026
The international health business of Cigna Healthcare is a healthcare and health services provider offering the highest standards of care to protect people’s health and well-being. We make healthcare easy to understand and provide the expertise people need to make infor...
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
120 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, 46204, US
Last Update: 03/09/2026
At Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield we understand our health connects us to each other. What we all do impacts those around us. So Anthem is dedicated to delivering better care to our members, providing greater value to our customers and helping improve the health of o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in 2026.
Incident History - Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Cigna Healthcare Hong Kong
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.