Comparison Overview
CIEE London

CIEE London
46-47 Russell Square, London, WC1B 4JP, GB
Last Update: 21/01/2026
Founded after World War II to promote peace and to build lifelong connections across countries and borders, CIEE now has more than 40 centres around the world that welcome US undergraduates, interns, high school students and scholars. CIEE London is based in Russell Sq...

University of North Texas
1155 Union Circle #311277, Denton, Tx, US, 76203-1277
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Ranked a Tier One research university by the Carnegie Classification, UNT is the flagship of the UNT System and is located in Denton, Texas. With 242 degree programs and a thriving community of nearly 44,000 students, UNT serves the North Texas region and helps drive th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CIEE London







University of North Texas






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CIEE London in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of North Texas in 2026.
Incident History - CIEE London (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CIEE London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of North Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of North Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CIEE London

University of North Texas
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.