Comparison Overview
CIEE Berlin

CIEE Berlin
Gneisenaustraße 27, Berlin, 10961, DE
Last Update: 27/11/2025
CIEE Berlin works with faculty, undergraduate & high school students to provide academic & internship programmes. Founded after World War II to promote peace and to build lifelong connections across countries and borders, CIEE now has more than 40 centres around the wo...

Newcastle University
King's Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, GB, NE1 7RU
Last Update: 10/07/2026
Newcastle University is a Russell Group university in the North East of England with a thriving international community of some 27,750 students from over 130 countries worldwide. As a member of the Russell Group of research intensive universities we have a world-class ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CIEE Berlin







Newcastle University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CIEE Berlin in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Newcastle University has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - CIEE Berlin (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CIEE Berlin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Newcastle University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Newcastle University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CIEE Berlin

Newcastle University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.