Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CIC LondonCIC London
VS
AkbankAkbank
CIC London

CIC London

15 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7EB, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ciclondon.com
752/1000Fair

CIC London is part of the Crédit Mutuel Group, one of Europe’s largest and best-rated banking groups. Formed in 1895, CIC London has over 125 years of presence in the City and has proven to be a reliable and stable business partner during all economic cycles. With consi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Akbank

Akbank

4. Levent Besiktas, Istanbul, 34330, TR

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.akbank.com
778/1000Fair

Akbank was founded as a local bank in Adana in January 1948. Established originally with the core objective to provide funding to local cotton producers, the Bank opened its first branch in the Sirkeci district of Istanbul on July 14, 1950. In 1954, after relocating its...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:14,632
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CIC London

CIC London

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Akbank

Akbank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIC London in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akbank in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CIC London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIC London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Akbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CIC London

CIC London

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Akbank

Akbank

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CIC London company and Akbank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CIC London and Akbank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CIC London and Akbank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CIC London or Akbank ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CIC London or Akbank ?
Between CIC London and Akbank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CIC London and Akbank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8