Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CIC IberbancoCIC Iberbanco
VS
CitizensCitizens
CIC Iberbanco

CIC Iberbanco

8 Rue d'Anjou Paris, Île-de-France 75008, FR

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cic-iberbanco.com
754/1000Fair

CIC Iberbanco accompagne les Français, Espagnols et Portugais tout au long de leurs projets en France et en péninsule ibérique. Présent sur tout le territoire français, avec 40 agences, CIC Iberbanco associe et valorise deux atouts majeurs : son origine ibérique ...

NAICS:522
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:51-200
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Citizens

Citizens

1 Citizens Plaza, Providence, 02903, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.citizensbank.com
601/1000Poor

At Citizens, we recognize that the journey to accomplishment is no longer linear and that individuals are made of all they have done and all they are going to do. As one of the oldest and largest financial services firms in the United States with a history dating back t...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:22,844
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CIC Iberbanco

CIC Iberbanco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Citizens

Citizens

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIC Iberbanco in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Citizens has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CIC Iberbanco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIC Iberbanco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Citizens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citizens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CIC Iberbanco

CIC Iberbanco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Citizens

Citizens

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CIT1776883843
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT248072825

FAQ

Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CIC Iberbanco company and Citizens company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CIC Iberbanco and Citizens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CIC Iberbanco and Citizens, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CIC Iberbanco or Citizens ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CIC Iberbanco or Citizens ?
Between CIC Iberbanco and Citizens, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CIC Iberbanco and Citizens, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA