Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CiberC LATAMCiberC LATAM
VS
OPPOOPPO
CiberC LATAM

CiberC LATAM

175 SW 7th St, Miami, 33130, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.ciberc.com/
691/1000Weak

CiberC specializes in offering IT services and advanced solutions, becoming one of the most prominent integrators in the region by investing in human resources and technology infrastructure, which has enabled it to ensure the best services and technical support maintena...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:184
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
OPPO

OPPO

China Resources Tower, Shenzhen, 518000, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.oppo.com/en
800/1000Good

Founded in 2004, OPPO is one of the world's leading innovators of smart devices. With operations in over 60 countries and regions, OPPO's more than 290,000 points of sales and 1,900 official service centers share the beauty of technology with users all over the world. T...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:53,397
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CiberC LATAM

CiberC LATAM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
OPPO

OPPO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

CiberC LATAM has 47.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OPPO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CiberC LATAM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CiberC LATAM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - OPPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OPPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CiberC LATAM

CiberC LATAM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEKCRRK3GGRECIB1767799956
OPPO

OPPO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
OPP603062425

FAQ

Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CiberC LATAM company and OPPO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CiberC LATAM and OPPO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CiberC LATAM and OPPO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CiberC LATAM or OPPO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CiberC LATAM or OPPO ?
Between CiberC LATAM and OPPO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CiberC LATAM and OPPO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8