Comparison Overview
Chubb Fire & Security

Chubb Fire & Security
2 Lotus Park, The Causeway, Staines, Surrey, GB, TW18 3AG
Last Update: 21/03/2026
Making the world a safer place. With over 200 years of heritage, Chubb is a global leader in fire and security solutions, dedicated to protecting what matters most. We provide comprehensive, end-to-end services - from system design and installation to proactive mainte...

Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
9 Campus Drive, Parsippany, 07054, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Securitas knows Security. It is our only business. As The Leader in Protective Services, we invest in people, knowledge and technology to deliver customized, cost-effective and class-leading solutions. Our parent company, Securitas AB, is a global company headquartered ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Chubb Fire & Security







Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chubb Fire & Security in 2026.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Chubb Fire & Security (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Chubb Fire & Security cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Chubb Fire & Security

Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.