Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health SystemCHRISTUS St. Michael Health System
VS
Rochester Regional HealthRochester Regional Health
CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

2600 Saint Michael Dr, Texarkana, Texas, 75503, US

Last Update: 14/11/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System, recognized as a High Performing Hospital by U.S. News & World Report for 2020-2021 and one of the nation’s 50 Top Cardiovascular Hospitals in the Nation by Fortune and IBM® Watson Health®, is nestled within over 128 acres of oak, pine...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:710
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

100 S Kings Hwy, Rochester, New York, US, 14617

Last Update: 16/06/2026

View Profile
674/1000Weak

Rochester Regional Health, headquartered in Rochester, NY, is an integrated health services organization serving the people of Western New York, the Finger Lakes, St. Lawrence County, and beyond. We are dedicated to helping our community stay healthy and live fulfilling...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:11,135
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Rochester Regional Health has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rochester Regional Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rochester Regional Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rochester Regional Health

Rochester Regional Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCXSO1781563504
🔒 Incident : Breach
ROCXSO1781634267

FAQ

Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System company and Rochester Regional Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System and Rochester Regional Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System and Rochester Regional Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System or Rochester Regional Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System or Rochester Regional Health ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System and Rochester Regional Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CHRISTUS St. Michael Health System and Rochester Regional Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8