Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CHRISTUS Spohn Health SystemCHRISTUS Spohn Health System
VS
LabcorpLabcorp
CHRISTUS Spohn Health System

CHRISTUS Spohn Health System

1702 Santa Fe, Corpus Christi, 78404, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.christusspohn.org
699/1000Weak

CHRISTUS Spohn Health System provides you with a career experience where quality of life meets quality of care. We are a faith-based, value driven health care ministry dedicated to providing excellent, effective, compassionate care to the people of South Texas. We stron...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,354
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Labcorp

Labcorp

531 South Spring Street, Burlington, 27215, US

Last Update: 25/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.labcorp.com
599/1000Very Poor

Clear and confident health care decisions begin with questions. At Labcorp, we’re constantly in pursuit of answers. As a global leader of innovative and comprehensive laboratory services, we help doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, researchers and patients m...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:42,956
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CHRISTUS Spohn Health System

CHRISTUS Spohn Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Labcorp

Labcorp

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHRISTUS Spohn Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Labcorp has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CHRISTUS Spohn Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHRISTUS Spohn Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Labcorp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labcorp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CHRISTUS Spohn Health System

CHRISTUS Spohn Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHR134711722
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHR17346822
Labcorp

Labcorp

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAB1790295835
🔒 Incident : Breach
PLALAB1790109185
🔒 Incident : Breach
LAB1790281763

FAQ

Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System company and Labcorp company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System and Labcorp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System and Labcorp, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CHRISTUS Spohn Health System or Labcorp ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CHRISTUS Spohn Health System or Labcorp ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System and Labcorp, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CHRISTUS Spohn Health System and Labcorp, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108773
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108772
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108770
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-108978
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-108769
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-11
UPDATED
Date2026-10-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8