Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AtlasAtlas
VS
JacobsJacobs
Atlas

Atlas

400 Connell Drive, Berkeley Heights, 07922, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
740/1000Moderate

Atlas is a 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹, 𝟭𝟬𝟬% 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻-𝗼𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗱, 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺 that partners with our clients to solve complex challenges, driving operational excellence and delivering impactful solutions. 𝗧𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗜...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:438
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Jacobs

Jacobs

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1200, Dallas, 75201, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jacobs.com
787/1000Fair

At Jacobs, we're challenging today to reinvent tomorrow – delivering outcomes and solutions for the world's most complex challenges. With a team of approximately 45,000, we provide end-to-end services in advanced manufacturing, cities & places, energy, environmental, li...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:66,963
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Atlas

Atlas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Jacobs

Jacobs

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacobs in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Atlas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Jacobs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacobs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Atlas

Atlas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
ATL20751122
Jacobs

Jacobs

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Atlas company and Jacobs company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Atlas and Jacobs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Atlas and Jacobs, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Atlas or Jacobs ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Atlas or Jacobs ?
Between Atlas and Jacobs, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Atlas and Jacobs, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3