Comparison Overview
Choice Hotels International

Choice Hotels International
915 Meeting St, North Bethesda, Maryland, US, 20852
Last Update: 20/05/2026
Choice Hotels International, Inc. (NYSE: CHH) is one of the largest lodging franchisors in the world. The challenger in upscale and a leader in midscale and extended stay, Choice® has nearly 7,500 hotels, representing more than 630,000 rooms, in 45 countries and territo...

Hilton
7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, 22102, US
Last Update: 10/06/2026
Hilton (NYSE: HLT) is a leading global hospitality company with a portfolio of 24 world-class brands comprising more than 8,400 properties and over 1.25 million rooms, in 140 countries and territories. Dedicated to fulfilling its founding vision to fill the earth with t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Choice Hotels International







Hilton






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
Choice Hotels International has 35.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hilton in 2026.
Incident History - Choice Hotels International (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Choice Hotels International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Choice Hotels International

Hilton
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.