Comparison Overview
ChipSoft Nederland

ChipSoft Nederland
Orlyplein 10, Amsterdam, 1043 DP, NL
Last Update: 23/06/2026
Better care together ChipSoft develops cutting-edge software that supports healthcare professionals –from medical specialists to admin and executives- in providing the best quality of care in the most efficient way. Our mission is to contribute to greater patient safet...

SAP
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE
Last Update: 07/10/2026
SAP is a global leader in enterprise applications and business AI. We help organizations run mission-critical operations across finance, procurement, supply chain, human resources, and customer experience -and move from systems that record work to systems that can help ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ChipSoft Nederland







SAP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
ChipSoft Nederland has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
SAP has 488.24% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ChipSoft Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ChipSoft Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ChipSoft Nederland

SAP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.