Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ChipSoft NederlandChipSoft Nederland
VS
GoogleGoogle
ChipSoft Nederland

ChipSoft Nederland

Orlyplein 10, Amsterdam, 1043 DP, NL

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile
533/1000Critical

Better care together ChipSoft develops cutting-edge software that supports healthcare professionals –from medical specialists to admin and executives- in providing the best quality of care in the most efficient way. Our mission is to contribute to greater patient safet...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:995
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Google

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://goo.gle/3DLEokh
165/1000Critical

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that ma...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:313,465
Subsidiaries:52
12-month incidents
48
Known data breaches
21
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ChipSoft Nederland

ChipSoft Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Google

Google

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

ChipSoft Nederland has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Google has 4471.43% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ChipSoft Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ChipSoft Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ChipSoft Nederland

ChipSoft Nederland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RIJST-CHI1775637791
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CHI1782225432
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHIDUT1775839803
Google

Google

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
APPDISTREGOOTHE1785342399
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOCOI1783686858
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
THECLOGOOTHE1782224973

FAQ

Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland company and Google company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland and Google, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ChipSoft Nederland or Google ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ChipSoft Nederland or Google ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland and Google, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ChipSoft Nederland and Google, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA