Comparison Overview
CHIPS for America

CHIPS for America
Washington D.C.-Gaithersburg, MD-Boulder, CO, US
Last Update: 06/02/2026
The bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 provides the U.S. Department of Commerce with $50 billion for a suite of programs to strengthen and revitalize the U.S. position in semiconductor research, development, and manufacturing—while also investing in American worke...

Applied Materials
3050 Bowers Avenue, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 15/06/2026
Applied Materials is the leader in materials engineering solutions that are at the foundation of virtually every new semiconductor and advanced display in the world. The technology we create is essential to advancing AI and accelerating the commercialization of next-gen...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CHIPS for America







Applied Materials






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CHIPS for America in 2026.
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Applied Materials has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - CHIPS for America (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CHIPS for America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Applied Materials (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Applied Materials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CHIPS for America

Applied Materials
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.