Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Chipotle Mexican GrillChipotle Mexican Grill
VS
TGI FridaysTGI Fridays
Chipotle Mexican Grill

Chipotle Mexican Grill

610 Newport Center Dr, Newport Beach, California, US, 92660

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.chipotle.com
717/1000Moderate

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: CMG) is cultivating a better world by serving responsibly sourced, classically-cooked, real food with wholesome ingredients without artificial colors, flavors or preservatives. Chipotle has over 3,800 restaurants in the United States,...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:47,097
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3
TGI Fridays

TGI Fridays

19111 North Dallas Parkway, Dallas, 75287, US

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tgifridays.com
781/1000Fair

In 1965, TGI Fridays opened its first location in New York City. Today, there are 380 plus restaurants in 30 plus countries offering high-quality, authentic American food and legendary drinks, bringing together all people from all places. The freeing and liberating spir...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:13,714
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Chipotle Mexican Grill

Chipotle Mexican Grill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TGI Fridays

TGI Fridays

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chipotle Mexican Grill in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TGI Fridays in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Chipotle Mexican Grill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chipotle Mexican Grill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TGI Fridays (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TGI Fridays cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Chipotle Mexican Grill

Chipotle Mexican Grill

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI1767917888
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHI911072925
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CHI608050724
TGI Fridays

TGI Fridays

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill company and TGI Fridays company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill and TGI Fridays, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill and TGI Fridays, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Chipotle Mexican Grill or TGI Fridays ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Chipotle Mexican Grill or TGI Fridays ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill and TGI Fridays, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Chipotle Mexican Grill and TGI Fridays, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9