Comparison Overview

China CITIC Bank

VS

ING Nederland

China CITIC Bank

Beijing, 100101, CN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.citicbank.com

Overview Thinking on the corporate banking of small and medium sized commercial banks • Ranked the 99th among 2008 Global Top 500 Financial Brands • Chen Xiaoxian, the Bank’s President, was granted “Top 10 Financial Figures” Award in the fourth consecutive year • Selection activity about the ranking list of “50 Most Influential Events of Financial Reform and Opening-up in China and 2008 China's Best Financial Institutions” • Best Corporate Banking Business Award among Top 10 Outstanding Commercial Banks in Asia • Global Times 2008 Most Popular Retail Banks among Readers • China Business News 2008 Development Strategy Award Corporate Financial Service Brand of the Year Retail Financial Service Brand of the Year President Chen Xiaoxian was awarded “Financier of the Year 2008” • Chinese Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Most Trusted Bank 2008 by Chinese CFO • British Magazine “The Banker” Ranked the 77th among the Top 1000 World Banks • British Financial Times Ranked the 260th among 2008 Global Top 500 Enterprises in Market Value • 21st Century Business Herald China’s Most Potential Private Banks of the Year • ASIA MONEY Best Domestic Providers of FX Services Best For Overall FX Services Best Domestic Banks for Cash Management in China • The Asian Banker Journal Best Wealth Management Award • Euromoney Best Private Banks of Stock Portfolio Management in China • America Annual Call Centre Exhibition World’s Best Call Center

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ING Nederland

Amsterdam Zuidoost, 1102 CT Netherlands, Amsterdam Zuidoost, 1102 CT, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ing.nl

ING ING is a global bank with a strong European base. With 14,500 employees in the Netherlands, we’re one of the biggest employers of the country. Our research tells us that we stand out here because of our great working culture, competitive benefits, and interesting work. We believe in sustainable progress for all, not just for the few. We aim to support and contribute to economic, social and environmental progress. Collaborative and inclusive We’re proud of our diverse and multinational make-up. Joining the ING team means contributing to a collaborative and inclusive culture, having a hybrid way of working, and being part of the positive impact that we strive to make on people and the planet. Purpose ING's purpose is empowering people to stay a step ahead in life and in business. This purpose guides us in everything we do. Rather than telling our people what to do, we trust them and encourage them to carve out their career in a way that works best for them. We want to enable them to grow in their own way, without being held down. Because doing great things starts by doing your thing.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,446
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinaciticbank.jpeg
China CITIC Bank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing-nederland.jpeg
ING Nederland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China CITIC Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ING Nederland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China CITIC Bank in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ING Nederland in 2026.

Incident History — China CITIC Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China CITIC Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ING Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ING Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinaciticbank.jpeg
China CITIC Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ing-nederland.jpeg
ING Nederland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China CITIC Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ING Nederland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ING Nederland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China CITIC Bank company.

In the current year, ING Nederland company and China CITIC Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ING Nederland company nor China CITIC Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ING Nederland company nor China CITIC Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ING Nederland company nor China CITIC Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China CITIC Bank company nor ING Nederland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ING Nederland company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to China CITIC Bank company.

ING Nederland company employs more people globally than China CITIC Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China CITIC Bank nor ING Nederland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References