Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

中建西部建设中建西部建设
VS
PCL ConstructionPCL Construction
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

四川省成都市高新区交子大道177号中海国际中心B座22楼, CHENGDU, SC | Sichuan, undefined, CN

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

主要经营业务板块:中建西部建设是国内领先的建材产业综合服务商,专注于混凝土及相关业务,并拥有从矿山、水泥、预拌混凝土、砂浆到运输、泵送、检测较为完整的产业链。 新业务拓展方向:建筑工业化、固废利用、基础设施、海外业务等。 主要经营区域(主要工作地点):公司主营业务覆盖西北、西南、东北、华北、华中、华南、东南等主要区域的二十余个省市,并跟随中国建筑,进入阿尔及利亚、马来西亚、印度尼西亚市场。主要工作地点为:新疆、甘肃、山东、河南、青海、湖北、安徽、江西、福建、四川、重庆、云南、广西、陕西、天津、山西、辽宁、湖南、海南、贵州、广东及部分海...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:269
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PCL Construction

PCL Construction

9915-56th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T6E 5L7

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pcl.com
771/1000Fair

PCL is a group of independent construction companies that carries out work across Canada, the United States, the Caribbean, and in Australia. These diverse operations in the civil infrastructure, heavy industrial, and buildings markets are supported by a strategic prese...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:12,124
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PCL Construction

PCL Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中建西部建设 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PCL Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 中建西部建设 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中建西部建设 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PCL Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PCL Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PCL Construction

PCL Construction

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PCL546072525

FAQ

Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and PCL Construction company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 中建西部建设 and PCL Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 and PCL Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 中建西部建设 or PCL Construction ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 中建西部建设 or PCL Construction ?
Between 中建西部建设 and PCL Construction, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 中建西部建设 and PCL Construction, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3