Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

中建西部建设中建西部建设
VS
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

四川省成都市高新区交子大道177号中海国际中心B座22楼, CHENGDU, SC | Sichuan, undefined, CN

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

主要经营业务板块:中建西部建设是国内领先的建材产业综合服务商,专注于混凝土及相关业务,并拥有从矿山、水泥、预拌混凝土、砂浆到运输、泵送、检测较为完整的产业链。 新业务拓展方向:建筑工业化、固废利用、基础设施、海外业务等。 主要经营区域(主要工作地点):公司主营业务覆盖西北、西南、东北、华北、华中、华南、东南等主要区域的二十余个省市,并跟随中国建筑,进入阿尔及利亚、马来西亚、印度尼西亚市场。主要工作地点为:新疆、甘肃、山东、河南、青海、湖北、安徽、江西、福建、四川、重庆、云南、广西、陕西、天津、山西、辽宁、湖南、海南、贵州、广东及部分海...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:269
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

900 7th Street, NW, Washington, 20001, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ibew.org
727/1000Moderate

The IBEW represents 860,000 active. and retired who work in a wide variety of fields, including utilities, construction, telecommunications, broadcasting, manufacturing, railroads and government. The IBEW has members in both the United States and Canada and stands out ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:13,005
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中建西部建设 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 中建西部建设 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中建西部建设 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBE3502335110725
🔒 Incident : Breach
IBE827072925

FAQ

Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 中建西部建设 and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 中建西部建设 or International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 中建西部建设 or International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) ?
Between 中建西部建设 and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 中建西部建设 and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA