Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

中建西部建设中建西部建设
VS
Bouygues ConstructionBouygues Construction
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

四川省成都市高新区交子大道177号中海国际中心B座22楼, CHENGDU, SC | Sichuan, undefined, CN

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

主要经营业务板块:中建西部建设是国内领先的建材产业综合服务商,专注于混凝土及相关业务,并拥有从矿山、水泥、预拌混凝土、砂浆到运输、泵送、检测较为完整的产业链。 新业务拓展方向:建筑工业化、固废利用、基础设施、海外业务等。 主要经营区域(主要工作地点):公司主营业务覆盖西北、西南、东北、华北、华中、华南、东南等主要区域的二十余个省市,并跟随中国建筑,进入阿尔及利亚、马来西亚、印度尼西亚市场。主要工作地点为:新疆、甘肃、山东、河南、青海、湖北、安徽、江西、福建、四川、重庆、云南、广西、陕西、天津、山西、辽宁、湖南、海南、贵州、广东及部分海...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:269
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78 280, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Bouygues Construction employs 35,600 people around the world, all driven by the greatest and most exciting responsibility of all – building for life. For our customers in more than 50 countries, we deliver much more than projects. We build to create spaces, connectio...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:24,731
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中建西部建设 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 中建西部建设 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中建西部建设 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 中建西部建设 or Bouygues Construction ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 中建西部建设 or Bouygues Construction ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2