Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

中建西部建设中建西部建设
VS
Bechtel CorporationBechtel Corporation
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

四川省成都市高新区交子大道177号中海国际中心B座22楼, CHENGDU, SC | Sichuan, undefined, CN

Last Update: 15/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

主要经营业务板块:中建西部建设是国内领先的建材产业综合服务商,专注于混凝土及相关业务,并拥有从矿山、水泥、预拌混凝土、砂浆到运输、泵送、检测较为完整的产业链。 新业务拓展方向:建筑工业化、固废利用、基础设施、海外业务等。 主要经营区域(主要工作地点):公司主营业务覆盖西北、西南、东北、华北、华中、华南、东南等主要区域的二十余个省市,并跟随中国建筑,进入阿尔及利亚、马来西亚、印度尼西亚市场。主要工作地点为:新疆、甘肃、山东、河南、青海、湖北、安徽、江西、福建、四川、重庆、云南、广西、陕西、天津、山西、辽宁、湖南、海南、贵州、广东及部分海...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:269
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Reston, 20190, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bechtel.com
729/1000Moderate

Bechtel is a trusted engineering, construction and project management partner to industry and government. Differentiated by the quality of our people and our relentless drive to deliver the most successful outcomes, we align our capabilities to our customers’ objectives...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:32,575
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 中建西部建设 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Bechtel Corporation has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 中建西部建设 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

中建西部建设 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bechtel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bechtel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
中建西部建设

中建西部建设

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bechtel Corporation

Bechtel Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BROBECTHEORAABB1773750615
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO3105131112625

FAQ

Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 中建西部建设 company and Bechtel Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bechtel Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 中建西部建设 or Bechtel Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 中建西部建设 or Bechtel Corporation ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 中建西部建设 and Bechtel Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8