Comparison Overview

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

VS

GREAT EASTERN

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

西城区金融街, 北京, undefined, 100020, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

China Life Insurance (Group) Company, headquartered in Beijing, is a large state-owned financial and insurance company. Its predecessor,PICC was founded in 1949 and the PICC (Life) Co.,Ltd was set up in 1996 after its separation from the former PICC. In 1999, it was renamed China Life Insurance Company. With the approval of the State Council and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission, the former China Life Insurance Company was restructured as China Life Insurance (Group) Company in 2003. It has China Life Insurance Company Limited, China Life Asset Management Company Limited, China Life Property & Casualty Insurance Company Limited, China Life Pension Company Limited, China Life Ecommerce Company Limited, China Life Insurance (Overseas) Company Limited, China Life Investment Holding Company Limited and Insurance Professional College as its subsidiaries. Its business covers life insurance, property & casualty insurance, pension plans (corporate annuity), asset management, alternative investment, overseas operations and e-commerce. Through capital-links, it has invested in several banks, security firms and other non-financial institutions.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42,345
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GREAT EASTERN

Last Update: 2025-11-27

Established in 1908, Great Eastern places customers at the heart of everything we do. Our legacy extends beyond our products and services to our culture, which is defined by our core values and how we work. As champions of Integrity, Initiative and Involvement, our core values act as a compass, guiding and inspiring us to embrace the behaviours associated with each value, upholding our promise to our customers - to continue doing our best for them in a sustainable manner. We embrace inclusivity, giving all employees an equal opportunity to shine and play their role in exploring possibilities to deliver innovative insurance solutions. Since 2018, Great Eastern has been a signatory to the United Nations (UN) Principles of Sustainable Insurance. Our sustainability approach around environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations play a key role in every business decision we make. We are committed to being a sustainability-driven company to achieve a low-carbon economy by managing the environmental footprint of our operations and incorporating ESG considerations in our investment portfolios; improving people’s lives by actively helping customers live healthier, better and longer; and drive responsible business practices through material ESG risk management. Please note that our career opportunities are only posted on our Career Website (https://gecareers.taleo.net/careersection/ex_singapore/jobsearch.ftl?lang=en&portal=8116760849) and on our authorised job platforms, such as, LinkedIn, JobStreet and eFinancialCareers. We do not initiate any unsolicited calls and all official emails from Great Eastern will be sent from email addresses ending with “@greateasternlife.com or @greateasterngeneral.com”. Should you receive any communications outside from these channels, please do not provide any personal information and do reach out to us at [email protected] for us to assist you and confirm the legitimacy of the content.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 13,454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-life-insurance-co-ltd.jpeg
China Life Insurance Co.Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-eastern-group.jpeg
GREAT EASTERN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Life Insurance Co.Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GREAT EASTERN
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Life Insurance Co.Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GREAT EASTERN in 2025.

Incident History — China Life Insurance Co.Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GREAT EASTERN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GREAT EASTERN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-life-insurance-co-ltd.jpeg
China Life Insurance Co.Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-eastern-group.jpeg
GREAT EASTERN
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2019
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial and Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GREAT EASTERN company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

GREAT EASTERN company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company has not reported any.

In the current year, GREAT EASTERN company and China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GREAT EASTERN company nor China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GREAT EASTERN company nor China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GREAT EASTERN company nor China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company nor GREAT EASTERN company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company nor GREAT EASTERN company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd company employs more people globally than GREAT EASTERN company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Life Insurance Co.Ltd nor GREAT EASTERN holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H