Comparison Overview

China Institute in America

VS

World Health Organization

China Institute in America

100 Washington St, New York, New York, undefined, 10006, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20

Founded in New York City in 1926 by American educators John Dewey, Paul Monroe, and Chinese scholars Hu Shi (胡適) and Kuo Ping-Wen (郭秉文), China Institute in America is an internationally-renowned U.S. nonprofit organization dedicated to deepening the world’s understanding of China through programs in art, business, cuisine, culture, and education.

NAICS: 92812
NAICS Definition: International Affairs
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

World Health Organization

20, avenue Appia, Geneva 27, GE, CH, 1211
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

The World Health Organization's mission: to promote health, keep the world safe, and serve the vulnerable. Working through offices in more than 150 countries, WHO staff work side by side with governments and other partners to ensure the highest attainable level of health for all people. Stay connected with WHO: Facebook https://www.facebook.com/WHO Twitter http://www.twitter.com/who Instagram: @who Google+ https://www.google.com/+who YouTube http://www.youtube.com/who

NAICS: 92812
NAICS Definition: International Affairs
Employees: 30,615
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-institute.jpeg
China Institute in America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-health-organization.jpeg
World Health Organization
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Institute in America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
World Health Organization
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Institute in America in 2025.

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Health Organization in 2025.

Incident History — China Institute in America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Institute in America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — World Health Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Health Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-institute.jpeg
China Institute in America
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerability in Apache HTTP server
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-health-organization.jpeg
World Health Organization
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Initial Access
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

World Health Organization company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to China Institute in America company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

World Health Organization company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to China Institute in America company.

In the current year, World Health Organization company and China Institute in America company have not reported any cyber incidents.

World Health Organization company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while China Institute in America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither World Health Organization company nor China Institute in America company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Both World Health Organization company and China Institute in America company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither China Institute in America company nor World Health Organization company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither China Institute in America company nor World Health Organization company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

World Health Organization company employs more people globally than China Institute in America company, reflecting its scale as a International Affairs.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Institute in America nor World Health Organization holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N