Comparison Overview

Chiltern Open Air Museum

VS

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance

Chiltern Open Air Museum

Newland Park, Gorelands Lane, Chalfont St Giles, England, HP8 4AB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coam.org.uk

Chiltern Open Air Museum was founded in 1976 with the aim of rescuing threatened buildings. More than thirty historic building have now been saved and rebuilt at the site, and there are more in store. The Museum only accepts buildings that would otherwise be demolished. The Museum’s collection focuses on vernacular buildings – the past houses and workplaces of ordinary people that are gradually disappearing from the landscape. In the Chilterns, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty on London’s doorstep, the pressures of redevelopment are particularly great. Chiltern Open Air Museum preserves a heritage that would otherwise have been lost. The Museum is a registered charity and receives no regular grants towards its running costs or capital projects. We are grateful for the fantastic support of over 200 volunteers and the Friends of the Museum Association.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance

2300 Steele St., Denver, Colorado, 80205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.denverzoo.org

Introducing Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance. New Name. Eternal Mission. For 128 years, Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance has connected people with wildlife. From our early years with just a few Colorado species to the 2,500+ animals thriving in our care today, we have cultivated a welcoming gateway to the wonders of the natural world. Today, our mission, Inspiring Communities to Save Wildlife for Future Generations, has never been more critical. This new name and logo reflect a renewed purpose: to continue delivering exceptional experiences on our historic campus, while doubling down on our commitment to conservation in Colorado and worldwide. #SavingWildlifeTogether

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-zoo.jpeg
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Chiltern Open Air Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chiltern Open Air Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance in 2025.

Incident History — Chiltern Open Air Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chiltern Open Air Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chiltern-open-air-museum.jpeg
Chiltern Open Air Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denver-zoo.jpeg
Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chiltern Open Air Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Chiltern Open Air Museum company.

In the current year, Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company and Chiltern Open Air Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company nor Chiltern Open Air Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum company nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance company employs more people globally than Chiltern Open Air Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Chiltern Open Air Museum nor Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References