Comparison Overview
Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile

Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile
CL
Last Update: 17/03/2026
Somos la empresa eléctrica que, desde hace 90 años, distribuimos, comercializamos y fomentamos el buen uso de la energía eléctrica en 33 comunas de la región metropolitana, Santiago de Chile. Nuestro objetivo es aportar al desarrollo de los más de 1’600,000 clientes que...

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 07/09/2026
Fortune Global 500 Company, Bharat Petroleum is the second largest Indian Oil Marketing Company and one of the premier integrated energy companies in India, engaged in refining of crude oil and marketing of petroleum products, with a significant presence in the upstream...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile







Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in 2026.
Incident History - Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Chilectra hoy es Enel Distribución Chile

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.